Wainhouse Research Home

Real-Time Unified Communications Industry
Discussion Forums

Research Reports
WR Platinum
Subscription Service
WR Bulletin
Free Newsletter
White Papers
Briefings
WR Summits
Point9
Peer Networking Group
Consulting
End User Services
Vendor Programs
Discussion Forums
Web Links
Event Calendar
Job Bank
About WR
Contact Us
Email List
Search
Shopping Cart


  WR Forums
  The WR Bulletin: Viewpoints
  Sonic Foundry video formats

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Sonic Foundry video formats
erikherz
Sr. Member

Posts: 41
From: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Since: Sep 2003

posted 22 February 2005 10:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for erikherz   Click Here to Email erikherz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In this week's bulletin Ira said: "We'd like to see support for more than just the Windows Media format ..." ... what formats would you like to see? Why would anyone need anything besides Windows Media?

Erik

IP: Logged

iweinstein
Wainhouse Research

Posts: 9
From: Morganville, NJ, USA
Since: Jul 2003

posted 23 February 2005 06:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for iweinstein   Click Here to Email iweinstein     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Agreed that Windows Media is a very commonly used format, but it is not the only format used within the Enterprise. There are environments that have standardized on Real, Apple Quicktime, etc.

From a flexibility point of view, we appreciate solutions that support content creation, ingestion, and playback in multiple formats. Such capabilities allow the solution to fit into the customer's existing environment, without forcing the customer to change their global deployment standards.

IP: Logged

erikherz
Sr. Member

Posts: 41
From: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Since: Sep 2003

posted 23 February 2005 06:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for erikherz   Click Here to Email erikherz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, but you might argue that standardization around a single protocol and format was what was needed for the video conferencing market to grow.

I think that the streaming industry is suffering from vendors that support so much format variety that their products are overly expensive, hard to use, non-interoperable, and generally complicated.

Would you just prefer Sonic Foundry to adopt some industry standard formats like MP4?

IP: Logged

Ruprecht
Sr. Member

Posts: 44
From: UK
Since: May 2004

posted 26 February 2005 07:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ruprecht     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Eric,

This raises a good point...what is a standard?

Ubiquity through market dominance/customer inertia (Microsoft) is too often seen as a 'standard'. MPEG4 offers a true open standard for vendors to offer good feature rich products.

VC has been using standards in video compression and the likes for years now, it's features and functions that win the deal.

Streaming is facing that same challenge as you rightly say, in the corporate space streaming gets placed in the 'too hard basket' all too often because of the inability to disconnect encoder from player.

R ;o)

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

WR Forums Sponsored By
www.lifesize.com www.globalmedia.com


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c
Forum contents (c)2000-2008 Wainhouse Research